
By Ron Lee
Investigative Journalist

Jim Humble
|
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) takes its regulation job seriously,
seemingly targeting anyone who won't - or can't - play ball in its high-dollar
industry-giants-only club. Unfortunately for Americans, it seems to have
forgotten its edict to promote and protect public health.
Of the products that
pass the FDA's “evaluation”, how many cause
serious illness or death? LOTS. A few come to mind: NutraSweet (Aspartame)
and Saccharin, Avandia, Chantix, Cymbalta, Enbrel, Gadolinium, Heparin, Levaquin,
Mesh/Sling Implants, Paxil, Pradaxa, Reglan, Ritalin, Seroquel, Simvastatin/Amiodarone,
Tylenol, Yasmin/Yaz, Zicam, many vaccines, and a great many “
food safe" additives the FDA has stamped with their approval. Just watch
T.V. and pay attention to the umber of commercials asking people to call
an attorney if they have taken any number of “FDA APPROVED” drugs/products
that have caused serious harm or death. It is clear, just because the FDA
evaluates something as safe, doesn't mean that it is.
So, when a product comes
along that actually does have health benefit, the FDA appears to descend
upon
it in hopes to squash it from existence. Are
they merely protecting the interests of the corporate giants and pharmaceutical
behemoths that seek to keep us reliant upon dosages of their products? For
the average American citizen, the answer seems pretty clear. "I don't
trust the government, especially the FDA. The American people are sicker
now and more apt to be on some prescription drug than any other time in history.
How is this good? They [the FDA] keep attacking natural alternatives like
raw cow and goat milk, plant extracts, home gardens and supplements that
have proven positive results," says one such citizen, disillusioned
with what they call "the bull the FDA is feeding us."
One exciting and reportedly "miraculous" health product is Master
Mineral Solution - commonly referred to as MMS or “Cleansing Water”.
By mixing MMS (sodium chlorite solution) and citric acid, it chemically generates
the compound, chlorine dioxide (ClO2), which is said to have profound positive
health benefits.
So now MMS and many involved with the movement are targets of the FDA. As
reported in this edition, Daniel Smith, a man from Spokane, Washington whose
business sold the ingredients to make chlorine dioxide in the privacy of
your own home, had his home raided by federal agents. Subsequently, his case
has been reviewed by two grand juries. It was through Daniel's efforts that
the US~Observer became involved and has since launched an investigation into
the legitimacy of the FDA claims, as well as the validity of MMS as a healing
remedy.
The US~Observer has received hundreds of personal accounts of MMS healing
users of a myriad of disorders, but we needed the truth in the form of documented
fact. Then the US~Observer received the blood work of an individual who had
been diagnosed with Hepatitis C. The reports were clear, this person had
the disease. Reportedly, after the subject treated himself with MMS, there
was no longer any sign of Hepatitis in his blood work!
But, this wasn't the only clinical evidence uncovered.
There was a controlled
clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide (the chemical created by mixing
MMS [sodium
chlorite] and citric acid) undertaken under
the auspices of USEPA HERL #CR805643. It was designed to look into the potential
health ramifications on the human body as the EPA was going to begin using
chlorine dioxide in water treatment facilities. The outcome of the study
as reported in "Controlled Clinical Evaluations of Chlorine Dioxide,
Chlorite and Chlorate in Man," by Judith R. Lubbers, Sudha Chauan, and
Joseph R. Bianchine:
"The
three phases of this controlled double-blind clinical evaluation of
chlorine
dioxide
and its
potential metabolites in human male volunteer
subjects were completed uneventfully. There were no obvious undesirable clinical
sequellae noted by any of the participating subjects or by the observing
medical team ... the absence of detrimental physiological responses within
the limits of the study, the relative safety of oral ingestion of chlorine
dioxide and its metabolites, chlorite and chlorate, was demonstrated."
Also, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), who used Chlorine
Dioxide to decontaminate office buildings and mail after the anthrax attacks
in 2001, Chlorine Dioxide has:
“...been used
since the early 1900s.
In 1967, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initially registered
liquid chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant and sanitizer for specific uses,
such as animal farms, bottling plants, food processing, handling, and storage
plants. It also included other uses, including:
• bleaching pulp
and paper
• bleaching textiles
• washing fruit and vegetables
• disinfecting flume water
• disinfecting meat and poultry
• disinfecting food processing equipment
• sanitizing water
• controlling odors
• treating medical wastes
• treating municipal water”
The EPA also says: “Chlorine
dioxide kills microorganisms by disrupting transport of nutrients across
the cell wall. Chlorine dioxide smells somewhat
like chlorine bleach. Chlorine dioxide should not be confused with chlorine
gas. They are two distinct chemicals that react differently and produce by-products
that have little in common.”
According to the many
testimonials of individuals using MMS, it has successfully treated MERSA,
cancer, the
flu, infections, serious burns, arthritis, arteriosclerosis,
stroke, asthma, Lyme disease, diabetes, hepatitis (all strains), leukemia,
Lou Gehrig’s disease, HIV, AIDS, Herpes, spider bites, and malaria.
It has also been reported that it successfully treats autism.
Basic logic would dictate that if it didn't work, or it caused adverse reactions,
there wouldn't be so many who openly and fervently support MMS. There are
sites all over the internet touting personal experiences with MMS. Groups
on Facebook and even YouTube channels have been dedicated to its benefits.
It has literally been used by millions around the globe.
Instead of looking into
MMS's potential for the people's common health, the FDA has chosen to strike
out at the claims of its benefits. They are
doing this primarily because of the amount of positive personal experiences.
You see, MMS has not been "evaluated". As such, it is potentially
harmful in the eyes of the FDA, and they have even issued an alert on its
use. But then again, growing your own garden (and sharing food), or milking
your own cows is now dangerous too, at least according to the FDA. Do a search
on the internet and see how the FDA is attacking these common practices which
have been around since the dawn of time! In fact, it appears that any personal
medicinal and food choice is being criminalized at an alarming rate. Soon,
we will only be able to eat what they tell us; grow what Monsanto provides
us; supplement and medicate ourselves with only the "best" unnatural
chemicals created in the labs of the corporate partners to the FDA.
"If people
let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take,
their bodies will
soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls
of those who live under tyranny."
~Thomas Jefferson
Who would you trust? A cancer survivor who found life in a natural product,
or a government agency that tells you to take products that it deems are
safe that actually make you ill? Hmmm... tough question.
Through its research, the US~Observer has found more than enough evidence
to expose the FDA for what it is; a scheme, with no constitutional authority
to exist. It seems designed to keep some people wealthy while the rest of
us are programmed into thinking they are there to help.
As for MMS, the US~Observer is conducting tests and is still collecting
testimonials. Anyone with clinical proof of healing is asked to send copies
of the evidence to: US~Observer, 233 Rogue River Hwy. PMB 387, Grants Pass,
OR, 97527; or via email to editor@usobserver.com.
If you would like to learn more about MMS go to www.genesis2church.org or
www.jimhumble.biz.
If you are interested in helping fight the FDA, the US~Observer has set-up a fund to meet that end.
Any donation amount is appreciated.